Case Study

“Success in any field, but especially in business is about working with people, not against them.”

Keith Ferrazzi, Never Eat Alone: And Other Secrets to Success, One Relationship at a Time

Case Study

Robert, a director and union member, has requested an 8 percent raise for his work unit. His request is based on recent finance reports showing that his department has substantially contributed to a 15 percent profit increase for the organisation. He feels that his team should be compensated for the hard work and long hours they have put in over the last few years to achieve this outcome.

Kay knows the value of Robert’s team and readily acknowledges their achievements. However, she knows that the company has plans to expand and diversify. This new project will use up the majority of the profit increase for at least the next five years. She is willing to sit down with Robert and talk about how his team can get involved in the new project. There could be new job opportunities, some overseas assignments, and possible promotions to various leadership positions within the new

project. Kay has flagged this with Robert; however, he is adamant that his team needs to be compensated with a monetary increase. He went as far as threatening to get the union involved if his request is unsuccessful.

Case study analysis

Identify one of the conflict-handling styles

From the case study we can identify that one of the conflict handling style that is present with Robert is Competing. This is evident as Robert has been insistent towards Kay that his team be compensated with a monetary increase, even though Kay has acknowledged Robert and his team’s achievements but her hands are tied due to the company’s plan on expansion and most of the funds will be put towards it. Additionally, Robert threatened to get the union involved if his request is unsuccessful.

Bargaining Approach

The bargaining approach is used whenever two parties attempt to reach a mutually acceptable solution during a conflict. There are two types of bargaining approach which is integrative and distributive. (Staff, 2019)

In the case study, Kay displayed integrative bargaining approach. From the case study, Kay was willing to take the time and sit down and talk to Robert and acknowledges him and his team’s achievements but she is unable to adhere to his request of monetary compensation. Knowing that, Kay tried to achieve a “win-win” situation by explaining to Robert that with this expansion there will be new job opportunities, some various overseas assignments and possible promotions to various leadership positions.

Aspect of interpersonal communication that is contributing to the poor environment

From the case study, we are able to identify that the poor listening skills is one of the factors that contributes to the poor environment. This is evident as Robert was adamant for the increment of pay and was willing to negotiate with Kay when she took the time to talk to him. Robert was too blinded by his own personal desire of being compensated that he became very unwilling to listen.

Thus from this case study, we recognise that listening plays a very important role during negotiations, it allows people to gain more understanding and by listening attentively it reduces any form of miscommunication.

Hall’s context model

With reference to Hall’s context model, Kay displayed High-Context culture, according to the case study, she is willing to take the time and effort to sit down to talk to Robert to solve the problem to try to come to a win-win situation where everyone can be satisfied, by doing so she is focused on relationships.

Reference

Staff, <. (2019). Negotiation in Business: Ethics, Bias, and Bargaining in Good Faith. [online] PON – Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School. Available at: https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/business-negotiations/are-you-negotiating-in-good-faith/ [Accessed 2 Aug. 2019].

STEREOTYPES

Stereotype is a set of belief of a particular person or a category of people, These beliefs can be detrimental and limiting intercultural understanding and communication. (Kareem, 2019)

In what ways do stereotypes affect the way that we communicate with each other? 

When we stereotype, we draw a conclusion of a particular person or group based on a common assumption, these assumptions are usually over generalised and these can often lead to communication breakdown. For example in America, Asians are usually stereotyped to be really good in math, and when there’s math assignments the Asians are usually approached by others to solve their math problems, but if the Asian person is bad at math, the American who’s seeking help might get mad and assume that the Asian is unwilling to help.

Below is a video of Russel Peters doing stand up about stereotypes of different races enjoy !

Link

What are the implications of such stereotyping occurring in your social life?

From my personal experience, i’ve gotten stereotyped by my relatives, below is a quick illustration of my conversation with my relative.

because i was doing Information Technology in Republic Polytechnic, my relatives assumed that i will be skilled programmer when in fact my major was in Networking.

Conclusion

In conclusion, stereotyping is an exaggerated assumption of a group of people that might have exhibited the certain stereotype and caused the idea to be associated with the group. Although our minds might be quick to condemn and pass a judgement, we should always try to think twice and always remember that stereotypes are not true for every individual of the group.

Reference

Nittle, N. K., 2019. Thought co. [Online]. Available at: https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-the-meaning-of-stereotype-2834956

Johari Window

What is the Johari Window model ?

The Johari Window model is created in 1955 by 2 psychologist Jospeh Luft and Harry Ingham. The Johari window model is a technique that helps people understand themselves and others better.

  1. Open / Free area, this is the area of what you think you know about yourself and what others think that they know about you.
  2. Blind Spot, is a state where it is unknown to the individual, but it is known to others.Open / Free area, this is the area of what you think you know about yourself and what others think that they know about you.
  3. Hidden area, an area where there are characteristics that an individual knows but others may not think you have it.
  4. The unknown area. This quadrant represents the unconscious self. In this area lies where the traits you think you have but not really sure and what other people think you have but not really sure either.Open / Free area, this is the area of what you think you know about yourself and what others think that they know about you.

Johari model examples

Rafael is a friend that i’ve known since i was really young and Michael is a friend that i’ve met when i joined UOW

Rafael’s perception of me
Michael’s perception of me

Is this an accurate presentation of myself?

I do believe this is an accurate representation of myself, through this experiment, where i have friends whom have known me for years and friends whom i’ve just met coming into university having similar response to the Open/ Free area.

Are there any area(s) that you are surprised from your friend’s perception of you?

Yes, although i am conscious of the image i am presenting myself to my friends there are still some attributes of myself that my friends describes me by that surprises me.

Explain how this result will be useful for self-awareness and my communication in a team.

This result gives a better insight of how others view me as a person and allows me to do some self reflection on what are the attributes that are undesirable to others that might have been oblivious to me. Thus productivity, performance and communication will be enhanced when the understanding of oneself is established.

SHANNON AND WEAVER COMMUNICATION MODEL, 1954.

“Smile. Be a good listener. Make others feel important”

– Dale Carnegie. “ How to win friends and influence people

Effective communication is vital for any business. Your success at getting your point across can be the difference between sealing a deal and missing out on a potential opportunity.

The key to successful communication is a result of using an effective communication model.

Shannon and Weaver’s Model (1954)

To first understand whether or not the Shannon and Weaver model is complete we first have to understand what it is.

Shannon and weaver model demonstrates the process of communicating based on a model which worked with a sender and a receiver, and it also worked well in the aspect of a long-distanced communication. 

There are 7 components in the model: Source, Encoder, Channel, Noise, Decoder, Receiver and Feedback.

The Source refers to the originator of the message; followed by the Encoder which is the transmitter that converts the message into signals. The message is sent via the channel or medium to the Decoder.

The message goes through the Decoder which receives the signal and converts the signals back into the message. Subsequently, the message will be sent to the Receiver.

However, during the process in the channel or medium, the messages may get affected by noise such as physical noise like vehicle traffic sounds and crowd noises, these noises will affect the communication flow or the receiver may not receive the correct message that was sent.

Is the Shannon and Weaver model complete ?

To a certain extent, the model is complete as it portrays the basics of communication. However, it lacks perception and context in the model.

Perception refers to the way how a message is interpreted, Different people have different perceptions on how they understand a message, for instance, the diagram below depicts 2 people having differing answers for the same picture.

Additionally, because the model was created by a mathematician and a scientist who was working in a telephone industry, the model lacks human feelings like non-verbal cues and emotions, these cues play a huge role on how people communicate, where different body posture and facial expressions might have a different meaning towards the message.

in conclusion, the Shannon and weaver model provides an understanding of how information is transferred and how messages are sent and received. But it doesn’t account for face to face interaction.

About me.

“There is no such thing as a ‘self-made’ man. We are made up of thousands of others. Everyone who has ever done a kind deed for us, or spoken one word of encouragement to us, has entered into the make-up of our character and of our thoughts, as well as our success.”

George Burton Adams EDUCATOR, HISTORIAN

Hi, my name is Keng Joo, i am 24 this year and currently pursing a degree in Business Information Systems. I am part of the UOW student body where we organise and plan events for the student of the school.

Some things that i enjoy doing; i enjoy reading, particularly books on self-improvement, constant reading and self-improving will help keep ourselves stay competitive and relevant in our fast paced society. Aside from reading i also really enjoy doing sports, a few sports i do include, basketball, badminton and softball.

Prior to this i was serving my National Service in the Singapore Police Force, under the Singapore Police Coast Guard.

Why did i decide to do this course

I’ve decided to pursue a degree in Business information Systems because coming from Republic Polytechnic majoring in Information Technology (IT), i realised then that my interest wasn’t sitting down for hours churning out pages of codes.

Not wanting to waste my experience in IT, i decided to go into BBIS. With the IT industry being one of the top growing industry in Singapore, i felt that BBIS would give me the best chance to dabble in both business and IT. My goal coming out of this course is to become a business analyst, solving problems and being the bridge between the business and IT side of an organization.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started